International affairs expert Glenn Dason spoke with Firstpost to assess the implications of the strike. He noted that although President Trump initially claimed he would wait two weeks before responding, the attack was launched within days. Dason pointed out that this appeared to be a deliberate act of deception, similar to Israel’s earlier surprise strike during negotiations.…KINDLY READ THE FULL STORY HERE▶
He explained that misleading flight paths were also used to disguise the imminent nature of the attack. While there are military advantages to such tactics, Dason emphasized that the credibility of the United States suffers when it claims to pursue diplomacy while carrying out strikes. He called it a tragic day for international law, the Non-Proliferation Treaty, and global institutions, highlighting that Trump no longer seems to rely on the assessments of U.S. intelligence services.
CLICK HERE: How to Make Money With Your Smart Phone Using Chatgpt With Simple Steps
Dason stated that Iran is now in a dilemma. If it retaliates too strongly, it could provoke deeper U.S. involvement, bringing destruction to Iran. However, if it fails to respond, it risks appearing weak and emboldening further attacks. He believes Iran is likely to choose a measured response, balancing between maintaining its credibility and avoiding alienation of its allies, including China and Russia. He also stressed that Iran aims to be seen as a responsible state and wants to avoid being labeled the aggressor, though he is certain that retaliation of some form is inevitable.
When asked about Trump’s warning of more powerful strikes, Dason offered two…KINDLY READ THE FULL STORY HERE▶
