The storm surrounding the legacy of June 12 has been reignited following a controversial accusation by former Governor Sule Lamido, who claimed that President Bola Tinubu supported the annulment of the 1993 presidential election—a pivotal moment in Nigeria’s democratic history. The presidency swiftly rejected Lamido’s allegation, describing it as a deliberate distortion of historical facts intended to tarnish President Tinubu’s reputation.
CLICK HERE: HOW TO MAKE MONEY ON SOCIAL MEDIA USING YOUR SMART PHONE
In a robust defense, presidential aide Bayo Onanuga asserted that Tinubu was a vocal opponent of the annulment long before General Sani Abacha assumed power. Onanuga further dismissed claims that Tinubu’s mother lent any support to the military regime, labeling such assertions as baseless and politically motivated.
Speaking in an interview, Onanuga emphasized Tinubu’s commitment to democracy and the rule of law, stressing that attempts to rewrite history would not undermine the President’s integrity or the strides Nigeria has made since that turbulent period. The renewed debate has reignited discussions about the complex and often contentious history surrounding June 12, which remains a symbol of Nigeria’s democratic aspirations.….KINDLY READ THE FULL STORY HERE▶
