According to Edwin Clark, Tinubu and others were the ones who opposed the removal of subsidy when Jonathan implemented it

In a recent statement, Pa Edwin Clark, the leader of the Southern and Middle-Belt Leaders Forum (SMBLF), has spoken out about the group’s purpose, during an interview with The Sun.

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

He explained that SMBLF was formed to fight for the interests of Southerners, people from the Middle Belt, and minorities across Nigeria and discussed various national issues.

Clark refrained from commenting extensively on President Tinubu’s performance, stating that he doesn’t have comment on that because he think one year is too early.

He expressed that it is premature to assess Tinubu’s administration, citing the challenging legacy left by the previous government.

Clark acknowledged Tinubu’s efforts but pointed out that the President has inherited huge problems.

He specifically addressed the issue of the oil subsidy and criticized the way the subsidy removal was handled, recalling a similar situation under President Jonathan.

He noted the inconsistency in political stances regarding subsidy removal and highlighted the importance of proper planning and foresight.

He underlined the need for general preparation to handle the negative effects on the citizens.

Despite acknowledging Tinubu’s bold step, Clark criticized the lack of preparation and foresight.

Clark called for greater honesty and planning among Nigerian politicians, urging them to avoid the partisan criticisms that have characterized past administrations.

“When Jonathan removed it on January 1, 2012, it was the same Tinubu, Atiku and others that were dancing, kicking against Jonathan and wanted Jonathan’s administration to come down. We had to support Jonathan. When they issue press statements, we would issue the next day, until Jonathan had to amend the situation and restore the subsidy,” he said.